PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026Foods1 citationsOpen Access

Development of a Risk Matrix for Assessing PFAS in Food Packaging

View Full Paper
KWKatja WackSASilvia ApprichJBJohannes Bergmair

Key Points

  • The aim is to create a risk matrix for assessing PFAS in food packaging to support compliance with EU regulations.
  • Developed a structured PFAS risk matrix for food packaging compliance screening.
  • Combined scientific evidence on PFAS occurrences with material classification systems.
  • Categorized packaging materials based on their likelihood of PFAS relevance.
  • Fibre-based materials with grease or water-resistant treatments showed higher PFAS relevance than glass or untreated paper.
  • Total fluorine (TF) and extractable organic fluorine (EOF) are identified as indicators rather than standalone compliance metrics.

Abstract

The minimisation of substances of concern in packaging is a key objective of the European Union’s Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR), complementing existing legislation governing the safety of food contact materials. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) present particular challenges due to their persistence, chemical diversity, and documented use in certain food contact materials. Article 5 of the PPWR requires packaging to be designed and manufactured to minimise such substances throughout the life cycle. This study develops a structured, material-based PFAS risk matrix to support compliance screening for food packaging under Article 5. The approach combines scientific evidence on PFAS occurrence, functional applications, and analytical detection with material classification systems used in recyclability assessments. Packaging materials are categorised by their likelihood of PFAS relevance, enabling proportionate prioritisation of efforts. Application of the matrix shows that fibre-based materials with grease- or water-resistant treatments exhibit higher relevance than glass, untreated paper, or polyethylene terephthalate (PET). The framework also clarifies the role of total fluorine (TF) and extractable organic fluorine (EOF) as supportive, material-specific indicators rather than standalone compliance metrics. By integrating PFAS considerations into design, sourcing, and portfolio management, the framework promotes proactive chemical risk governance aligned with circular economy objectives.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wack et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5e745a333a821460cd52https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15071183
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Phthalates, bisphenols and per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances migration from food packaging into food: a systematic review2025 · 24 citations
  2. 2Total organic fluorine to assess per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in food contact materials: a call for harmonised methodologies2025 · 4 citations
  3. 3Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances contamination in dairy: A global perspective2025 · 2 citations
  4. 4An overview of the uses of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)2020 · 2,385 citations
  5. 5Reconciling Terminology of the Universe of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances2021 · 110 citations