PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026Learning Environments Research3 citationsOpen Access

Participatory learning environments: student and teacher perspectives on classroom decision-making

TKTobias KärnerMJMichael JüttlerMBMatthias Bottling

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore student participation in decision-making within participatory learning environments and its impact on autonomy and motivation.
  • Nationwide survey conducted with 994 students and 516 secondary teachers in Germany.
  • Analysis focused on three forms of learner influence: self-determination, conditional co-determination, and external determination.
  • Examination of six domains: teaching content, learning goals, methods, social interactions, assessment criteria, and test formats.
  • Students reported low levels of self-determined participation and high levels of external determination.
  • Teachers perceived students as having more conditional co-determination than students reported.
  • Perceived autonomy was found to mediate the relationship between participation and both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation.

Abstract

Abstract This study examines student participation as a core feature of participatory learning environments and its relationship to autonomy and motivation. Drawing on a nationwide survey of 994 students and 516 secondary teachers in Germany, it analyses three qualities of learner influence—self-determined participation, conditional co-determination, and external determination—across six instructional domains: teaching content, learning goals, methods, social interactions, assessment criteria, and test formats. The results show that students report limited self-determined participation and high external determination, whereas teachers perceive students as having greater opportunities for conditional co-determination and less externally imposed control. Structural equation models confirm that perceived autonomy mediates the relationship between participation and both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Moreover, autonomy-supportive teacher behavior fosters participatory practices, while systemic barriers constrain them. Empirically mapping these perceived opportunities for influence provides a crucial foundation for understanding the existing scope and limitations of participation in educational settings, underscoring that calls for responsibility and self-determination must be matched by genuine opportunities to influence the conditions under which learning takes place.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kärner et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5e995a333a821460d062https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-026-09576-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Anticipated Impact of Participatory Democratic Education: an Empirical Study of Teacher Beliefs and Implementation Barriers2026
  2. 2Teachers’ participation in school decision-making: opportunities and constraints across professional domains2026
  3. 3Assessment of the level and quality of participation in educational work in secondary school: Opinions of students and teachers2025
  4. 4Teacher and Parent Participation in Schools in the Context of Neoliberal Participation and Democratic Education Principles2026
  5. 5Between ideals and realities: Understanding teachers’ concerns about democratic student participation in classroom settings2026