Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This investigation reveals how paraspeckles support nuclear localization and activation of unphosphorylated miR-34a post-irradiation, suggesting important cellular mechanisms.
Background/Objectives: Canonical microRNAs possess a 5′ phosphate required for Argonaute binding and activity. However, prior work identified an unphosphorylated, inactive nuclear pool of the important radiation-responsive microRNA, miR-34, that is rapidly phosphorylated and activated in response to ionizing radiation (IR). Here, we extend this work and investigate the role of paraspeckles, a phase-separated nuclear sub-compartment, and their association with the localization of unphosphorylated miR-34a. Methods: Mass spectrometry was performed to identify interacting partners of unphosphorylated mir-34. CRISPR-mediated deletion of the paraspeckle NEAT1_2 triple helix motif was performed to create an A549 cell line lacking paraspeckles (dTH). Activity and expression of mir-34a post-irradiation were evaluated by qRT-PCR and luciferase assays comparing dTH and wild-type (WT) A549 cell lines. In situ hybridization (ISH) was performed to evaluate mir-34a localization before and after IR, comparing dTH and WT cell lines. Results: Mass spectrometry identified paraspeckle proteins as significantly enriched interacting partners of unphosphorylated mir-34 mimics. By qRT-PCR and luciferase assays, we found that paraspeckle loss prevented radiation-induced early activation of unphosphorylated mir-34a. We found no difference in radiation-induced transcription of pri-miR-34a, but early processing to pre-miR-34a appeared delayed. ISH confirmed that loss of paraspeckles altered the nuclear localization of miR-34a before and after IR. Conclusions: These data suggest that paraspeckles are associated with nuclear localization and early radiation-responsive activation of unphosphorylated miR-34a. This suggests a coordinated nuclear sequestration of this important miR in its unphosphorylated state to enable an enhanced radiation response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Read et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: