Key result
Sleeve gastrectomy adds ~1.4 QALYs over pharmacological therapy and is highly cost-effective.
Why the study?
Obesity and associated type 2 diabetes mellitus represent a growing global public health challenge, prompting evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of sleeve gastrectomy versus pharmacological therapy from the perspective of the reimbursement institution in Türkiye.
Does sleeve gastrectomy improve cost-effectiveness and health outcomes compared to pharmacological therapy in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Does sleeve gastrectomy improve cost-effectiveness and health outcomes compared to pharmacological therapy in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Sleeve gastrectomy is a highly cost-effective treatment option compared to pharmacological therapy for patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus in Türkiye, providing greater health benefits at an acceptable incremental cost.
May warrant greater sleeve gastrectomy uptake in obesity with T2DM; extends cost-effectiveness evidence to middle-income settings.
Objectives Obesity and its associated type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) represent a growing public health challenge worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) compared with pharmacological therapy (PT) in patients with obesity and T2DM from the perspective of the reimbursement institution in Türkiye. Methods A Markov cohort model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of SG compared with PT in patients with obesity and T2DM. The model simulated a cohort of 1,000 individuals entering the model at age 40 years over a 60-year lifetime horizon from the perspectives of the Social Security Institution (SGK) and the Public Health Service Price Schedule (PHSP). Cost data were obtained from hospital records of 44 patients receiving PT and 55 patients undergoing SG, while effectiveness inputs were derived from published literature. Costs were calculated for the 2023 price year, and both costs and health outcomes were discounted at an annual rate of 3%. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess parameter uncertainty. Results According to the Markov model results, lifetime total costs were estimated at US$3,412.9 for PT and US$4,043.8 for SG. Lifetime health outcomes, measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), were 11.33 for PT and 12.68 for SG. Compared with PT, SG provided an additional 1.35 QALYs at an incremental cost of US$630.9, corresponding to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$467 per QALY gained. Conclusions The results indicate that SG is a cost-effective treatment option for patients with obesity and T2DM in Türkiye, providing greater health benefits at an acceptable incremental cost compared with PT. The relatively lower healthcare costs in Türkiye may further enhance the long-term cost-effectiveness of SG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeybek et al. (2026) studied Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (n=99). Sleeve gastrectomy vs. Pharmacological therapy was evaluated on Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Sleeve gastrectomy provided an additional 1.35 quality-adjusted life years compared with pharmacological therapy at an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of US$467 per QALY gained.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: