This review assesses in silico models predicting developmental neurotoxicity from thyroid disruption, highlighting the need for improved modeling tools.
Thyroid disruption (TD) plays a critical role in developmental neurotoxicity (DNT), given the essential functions of thyroid hormones in brain development. The identification and assessment of DNT caused by TD have become a significant focus in regulatory toxicology, necessitating the use of innovative approaches that are both predictive and efficient. This study provides a comprehensive examination of in silico new approach methodologies, with a particular emphasis on (quantitative) structure-activity relationship ((Q)SAR) models. Models anchored in the adverse outcome pathway framework offer mechanistic insights and predictive capabilities for assessing DNT linked to TD. By integrating knowledge of molecular initiating events and key events associated with thyroid hormone disruption, quantitative structure-activity relationships models provide a streamlined approach for predicting DNT. This systematic review identified 44 relevant studies documenting a total of 178 predictive models. The distribution of models across endpoints reveals that the most dominant endpoints are PXR (72), TTR (45), and TPO (21). A rigorous quality assessment showed that only 32 models are fully compliant with the OECD QAF (Quality Assessment Framework) criteria. This highlights the urgent need for more robust, endpoint-specific modeling tools.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Judzińska et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: