Quantifies year-to-year variability of radon levels in homes, suggesting recommendations for follow-up measurements.
Background: Health risks from radon exposure depend on long-term radon concentrations. This study quantified interannual variability in residential radon concentrations in Finland and evaluated its implications for exposure assessment and measurement recommendations. Methods: A random sample of 277 dwellings from the national radon registry, representative of Finnish regions, building types, and construction years, was monitored using year-long Makrofol-based track-etch detectors over four consecutive years (2021–2025). Year-to-year variability was characterized using the coefficient of variation (CV). Simulations incorporating the observed CVs, previously established seasonal correction factors, and measurement uncertainty were conducted to determine thresholds for follow-up measurements in relation to reference levels. Results: The coefficient of variation (CV) for normalized annual mean concentrations was 0.16, with 90% of dwellings exhibiting CV≤ 0.30. Although substantial variation occurred at the individual dwelling level, no statistically significant differences in overall radon levels were observed between years. Simulations showed that applying a 100 Bq/m3 threshold for recommending follow-up measurements results in an approximately 3% false-negative rate relative to the 200 Bq/m3 reference level. Lowering the threshold to 70 Bq/m3 reduces this probability to approximately 1%. Conclusions: These findings are consistent with international studies and provide an empirical basis for recommendations on follow-up radon measurements and for quantifying uncertainties in radon exposure assessment in Finnish dwellings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Turtiainen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: