Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Defines sex-associated transcriptional differences in healthy skin, indicating lineage-specific regulation of skin biology.
Background/Objectives: Sex differences influence skin physiology, immune regulation, and disease susceptibility, but the cellular organization of sex-biased transcriptional programs in healthy human skin remains incompletely defined. We aimed to define sex-associated differences in cellular composition and gene expression in healthy adult truncal skin at single-cell resolution. Methods: We constructed a sex-resolved single-cell transcriptomic atlas of healthy human truncal skin by integrating scRNA-seq data from 12 donors (5 males, 7 females). After quality control, 107,967 cells were classified into 14 major cell types. Sex-associated differences were assessed using donor-level pseudo-bulk analyses at both whole-skin and cell-type-resolved levels. Results: The cellular composition was conserved between sexes, with significant differences in mast cells and regulatory T cells. Whole-skin pseudo-bulk analysis identified distinct male-biased and female-biased transcriptional programs. Male-biased signals were linked to extracellular matrix organization and immune responses, while female-biased signals involved ion transport and neuromodulation. Cell-type-resolved analysis revealed that most sex-biased genes were lineage-specific, with minimal cross-lineage sharing. Conclusions: Sexual dimorphism in healthy human truncal skin is encoded through lineage-structured transcriptional regulation rather than broad compositional changes, providing a framework for understanding sex-biased skin homeostasis and disease susceptibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: