Comparative study examines judicial behavior in administrative litigation, suggesting insights for public law practices.
Although it has been discussed under a variety of names, e.g., public law litigation or institutional litigation in the United States, public interest litigation or social action litigation in India, Gendaigata sosyo(the contemporary model litigation) in Japan, I would like to use the word "Public Law Litigation" as a neutral word, which refers to a litigation model that involves large public interests, without local characteristics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hajime Sato (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: