Case reports highlight two instances of imported paragonimiasis in children, suggesting family clustering improves diagnosis.
Rare disease Background:Paragonimiasis, a food-borne parasitic zoonosis mainly caused by Paragonimus westermani and Paragonimus skrjabini in China, is rarely reported in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, a low-incidence urban setting.Paragonimiasis is often misdiagnosed due to its long incubation period, atypical manifestations, and low clinician awareness in non-endemic regions.Pleural effusion is common in thoracopulmonary paragonimiasis.We describe 2 imported, family-clustered pediatric cases (cousins) from endemic Zhaotong, Yunnan Province, both of whom presented with pleural effusion detected by chest computed tomography (CT); our report highlights clustered imported paragonimiasis in a low-incidence city. Case Reports:Case 1: A 4-year-old boy was admitted with an 8-day history of fever and cough and was initially misdiagnosed with bacterial pneumonia (elevated leukocyte count, C-reactive protein levels, and loculated pleural effusion).Paragonimiasis was suspected based on eosinophilia and epidemiological exposure; it was confirmed by positive Paragonimus IgG test results.The patient recovered after treatment with oral praziquantel (PZQ).Case 2: The 9-year-old cousin of the patient in Case 1 displayed a persistent cough 1 month after the first case, with eosinophilia, right-sided pneumonia, and pleural effusion.Recognition of family clustering facilitated prompt diagnosis and successful treatment with PZQ. Conclusions:This report highlights imported, family-clustered pediatric paragonimiasis in Hangzhou, a low-incidence city, providing greater diagnostic and epidemiological value than sporadic cases.Family clustering serves as a key clue for reducing misdiagnosis in non-endemic regions.Clinicians should consider paragonimiasis in children with relevant epidemiological exposure, unexplained pleural effusion, or eosinophilia, particularly when family clustering is present.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: