PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 4, 2026Environmental Earth Sciences5 citationsOpen Access

Explainable machine learning with ensemble-based uncertainty quantification for groundwater quality indices in the Ganfu Plain, China

QMQingshan MaChina Geological SurveyWGWeiya GeChina Geological SurveyAAAlireza ArabTU Bergakademie Freiberg

Key Points

  • The research aims to create a framework for assessing groundwater quality indices using data-driven methods while quantifying uncertainty.
  • Developed a data-driven framework combining groundwater quality indices and machine learning techniques.
  • Employed PSO-optimized XGBoost modeling for predictions.
  • Utilized SHAP for model interpretability and identifying key predictors.
  • Conducted ensemble-based quantile uncertainty quantification to analyze predictive variance.
  • Achieved strong predictive performance with low root mean square error (RMSE) values.
  • Identified manganese, nitrate, and spatial parameters as major predictors.
  • Showed that predictive variance was primarily aleatoric, with informative epistemic variance.
  • EWQI predictive intervals were wider, indicating greater sensitivity to parameters and spatial heterogeneity.

Abstract

Groundwater quality assessment is essential for sustainable water resource management, particularly in regions experiencing intensive anthropogenic pressures. In this study, we developed a data-driven framework that integrates groundwater quality indices, PSO-optimized XGBoost modeling, SHAP-based interpretability, and ensemble-based quantile uncertainty quantification. This framework enables simultaneous prediction, interpretation, and rigorous uncertainty analysis, and was applied to the Ganfu Plain, China, to predict both the water quality index (WQI) and entropy-weighted water quality index (EWQI) using hydrochemical and spatial parameters. The models achieved strong predictive performance, with nested cross-validation yielding low RMSE values across most folds. SHAP analysis consistently identified Mn, NO ₃\, ^-, and spatial coordinates as the most influential predictors, whereas conventional bulk parameters such as total hardness and sulfate contributed minimally, particularly in the EWQI model. Uncertainty analysis showed that predictive variance was dominated by aleatoric contributions, while epistemic variance remained comparatively small but informative of data scarcity. Predictive intervals were wider for EWQI, reflecting its greater sensitivity to key parameters and its ability to capture localized spatial heterogeneity. Overall, the framework provides a robust, interpretable, and scalable tool for groundwater quality evaluation and sustainable management under data-limited conditions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d0ae68659487ece0fa4648https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-026-12933-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper