Integrated framework analyzes flow instability in gas-liquid flows, suggesting new insights for industrial control.
Characterizing instability in gas–liquid flows is difficult because flow dynamics interact across multiple scales. In this work, we develop an integrated framework that combines multi-resolution analysis with composite multiscale equiprobable symbolic sample entropy (MRA-CMESSE). This combination enables us to examine flow instability from a multistructural and multiscale perspective. A comprehensive evaluation across four distinct metrics shows that our method is more robust to changes in data length than multiscale sample entropy and composite multiscale sample entropy approaches. Furthermore, MRA-CMESSE is applied to analyze differential pressure time series from vertical air–water two-phase flow, providing a quantitative characterization of the instability of three flow patterns. Among these, bubble flow is the most unstable, with energy spread out and high complexity at small scales; slug flow is the most stable, with its energy focused at larger scales with low complexity, and churn flow falls in between. A central finding is that as superficial gas velocity increases, energy and complexity shift to the meso-scale and micro-scale. This quantitative analysis identifies increased agitation at the meso-scale and micro-scale as the primary driver of enhanced overall flow instability. This framework offers a new quantitative basis for analyzing gas–liquid two-phase flows and strengthens the physical foundation for the monitoring and control of related industrial systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: