PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 4, 2026British Journal of General Practice0 citationsOpen Access

“Quick wins” vs “eating the frog”: Exploring general practitioners’ prioritisation dilemmas.

AMAndrew McClareyADAgata Anna DunsmoreDMDuncan McNab

Key Points

  • The research aims to understand how experienced GPs prioritize their acute workload and the factors influencing their decisions.
  • Conducted qualitative research using focus groups of GP educators in central Scotland.
  • Participants were GP educators involved in supervising GP Registrars, recruited through convenience sampling.
  • Five focus groups were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.
  • Thirty-seven GP educators participated, revealing five main themes in their prioritisation processes.
  • GPs adapt their consultation styles based on workload demands and system awareness.
  • Familiarity with patients assists in quicker decision-making but may introduce bias.
  • Personal preferences affect how GPs prioritize cases, balancing between simple and complex presentations.

Abstract

Background Prioritisation is an increasing part of a GP’s workload, though learning this skill is usually left to on-the-job training. Little is known about how experienced GPs prioritise their workload. Aim This study aimed to explore the factors that experienced GPs consider when prioritising their acute workload Design and Setting This qualitative research study used focus groups of GP educators based in central Scotland to explore the factors that they consider when prioritising their acute workload. Method Participants were recruited through convenience sampling. The key inclusion criterion was being involved in the supervision of GP Registrars. Five focus groups were carried out and transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis to identify the dilemmas that GPs face when prioritising their workload. Results Thirty-seven participants took part. Five themes emerged from the data; (1) GPs maintain an awareness of their work system and adapt their consultation style to demand. (2) They make decisions in an order which manages their time efficiently. (3) Their familiarity with patients and clinical experience enables them to make quick decisions about patient care, though this can lead to bias in decision-making. (4) They rely on their therapeutic relationships with patients and working relationships with colleagues when making decisions. (5) Their personal preferences are important, such as managing the simplest or the most complex presentations first. Conclusion Prioritisation is an increasingly important skill in modern General Practice. It is crucial that those involved in prioritisation are given the time and tools necessary to adequately develop this skill.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

McClarey et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d0ae94659487ece0fa47a9https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp.2025.0628
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Do physicians' attitudes toward prioritization predict poor‐health patients' access to care?2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2The hidden work of general practitioners: An ethnography2024 · 19 citations
  3. 3‘Don’t work more than 3 days straight’: Working conditions as learning conditions in general practice2026
  4. 4Sustaining a career in general practice: a qualitative study of experienced GPs in South West England2026
  5. 5“There is never any rest, never enough time and too much to do”: a qualitative study of GP work intensity in an Irish context2026