Pilot study evaluates high-flow nasal cannula use for stress and comfort in adults during dental treatment, suggesting feasibility for future trials.
Background: Dental treatment often requires prolonged mouth opening. This may compromise comfort during spontaneous nasal breathing and saliva swallowing, leading to stress or anxiety. A high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) delivers warmed and humidified air at high flow rates and may improve breathing comfort; however, the feasibility of its routine use during dental treatment has not been established. Objectives: The primary objective of this pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a definitive clinical trial to investigate the use of a HFNC during dental treatment. The secondary objective is to explore preliminary patient-centered outcomes related to stress and comfort to inform the design of future clinical trials. Methods: This single-center, open-label pilot feasibility study will be conducted at Nagasaki University Hospital, with adult patients undergoing routine full-mouth periodontal treatment participating in two treatment sessions, one without a HFNC and one with a HFNC, separated by at least four weeks. The primary feasibility outcomes include recruitment and retention rates, patient tolerance and acceptability of the HFNC, completeness of data collection, and device-related adverse events. The secondary outcomes are exploratory and include physiological stress-related parameters (pulse rate, respiratory rate, autonomic nervous system indices, and electroencephalographic alpha wave activity) and patient-reported comfort assessed using a questionnaire. Conclusions: This pilot study was designed to assess the feasibility and safety of HFNC use during full-mouth periodontal treatment and to inform the design of future definitive clinical trials. In particular, the resultant exploratory patient-centered outcomes and preliminary data may be used to guide outcome selection and sample size estimation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ayuse et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: