Editorial provides guidance on improving modeling papers for better publication outcomes, enhancing impact.
Models are playing an increasingly important role in the development of management theory. From the journal’s inception, Strategy Science has welcomed formal models, including analytic models, computational models, and simulation studies. Unfortunately, many modeling papers face first round rejection. They usually suffer from a relatively small set of issues. In this editorial, we provide specific guidance on how to address five of the most common issues in modeling papers. The goal is to provide a short practical guide for authors to enhance their chances of publication and subsequent impact.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wibbens et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: