PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 4, 2026Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion3 citations

Understanding Neither Atheists Nor Religious: Religious Nones and Multiple Religious Believing in South Korea

View Full Paper
HKHyun Woo KimFSFrancis Jae‐Ryong SongKYK.H. Yoo

Key Points

  • The research aims to explore the relationship between religious identities and beliefs in South Korea, particularly focusing on individuals identifying as neither atheists nor religious.
  • Utilized data from the 2024 Global East Survey of Religiosity and Spirituality across East Asia.
  • Analyzed religious identities and beliefs among individuals in South Korea.
  • Examined associations between religious identity and multiple belief systems.
  • Found significant gaps between declared religious identities and actual beliefs.
  • Identified multiple religious believing as the dominant pattern in South Korea.
  • Revealed that Buddhist identity is most associated with multiple religious belief, integrating various teachings.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Using data from the 2024 Global East Survey of Religiosity and Spirituality collected across multiple East Asian countries, this study examines how religious identities and beliefs function as loosely coupled phenomena, particularly in South Korea. The analysis reveals substantial gaps between declared identities and actual beliefs, with multiple religious believing emerging as the dominant pattern. Individuals hold heterogeneous beliefs that diverge from their stated identities, particularly those identifying as neither atheist nor religious, who show receptivity to various teachings without exclusive affiliation. Buddhist identity shows the strongest association with multiple religious believing, encompassing Catholicism, Confucianism, and folk religion while excluding Protestantism. These patterns suggest that South Korean religiosity operates through flexible religious portfolios rather than exclusive commitments, reflecting a unique form of syncretism. The study underscores the importance of analytically distinguishing identity, belief, and practice when measuring religiosity, particularly where indigenous traditions function more as cultural repertoires than as institutional memberships.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d0aee0659487ece0fa4cfchttps://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.70047
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Confucianism, A Habit of the Heart2016 · 10 citations
  2. 2The Rise of “No Religion”: Towards an Explanation2017 · 88 citations
  3. 3Measuring Religiosity of East Asians: Multiple Religious Belonging, Believing, and Practicing2023 · 28 citations
  4. 4Thinking Outside the West: Religious Change from the Nation-State to the Global-Market Regime2023 · 4 citations
  5. 5Korean American Evangelicals2006 · 59 citations