Quantitative analysis shows caregiver qualities affect resident satisfaction, indicating training improvements for caregivers may enhance outcomes.
Background: Caregiver and resident interactions are important to resident satisfaction with long-term care (LTC). However, these are variously operationalized, and caregiver–resident interactions of “spending time” (activity and autonomy) and environmental quality are less well investigated modifiable factors to inform LTC resident support policies for health aging. Methods: This quantitative, cross-sectional study analyzed secondary survey data from 326 long-term care facility (LTCF) residents (aged ≥60) across Shanghai, Nanjing, and Changsha, China. Satisfaction was measured using the Chinese version of the Ohio Long-Term Care Resident Satisfaction Survey. Caregiver Qualities served as the primary predictor, with spending time and environment as parallel mediators. Analysis adjusted for age cohort, functional independence, and length of stay. Results: Caregiver qualities were positively associated with overall satisfaction (β = 0.30, p < 0.01). Spending time (effect = 0.14, 95% CI: −0.01 to 0.30) and environment quality (effect = 0.05, 95% CI: −0.03 to 0.15) showed non-significant mediated pathways between caregiver qualities and satisfaction, but the combined indirect effect of these domains was statistically significant (effect = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.36). The direct association between caregiver qualities and satisfaction remained significant after accounting for these mediators (effect = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.61). Conclusions: These findings clarify how caregiver interactions are important to resident satisfaction both directly and indirectly through spending time, activity engagement, and environmental perceptions. To promote longevity and healthy aging in LTCFs, providers should prioritize caregiver training that fosters resident autonomy, supports daily activity, and maintains age-responsive care environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: