Public spaces (PSs) are vital to urban life, enhancing environmental sustainability, fostering social connections, and boosting public health. Cities have suffered from pandemics, which are becoming more frequent. Recent health crises have revealed significant shortcomings in public spaces’ capacity to preserve social support, safety, and functionality during pandemics. Despite urban resilience having developed as a critical concept for tackling such difficulties, its implementation in PS design remains limited, particularly in low- and middle-income contexts. The study’s main aim is to ascertain how ideas of urban resilience (UR) can be turned into measurable metrics to create and evaluate resilient public spaces during health crises. Several methods, including spatial analysis and questionnaire-based evaluations (n = 145), were analyzed using the Relative Importance Index (RII). This approach highlights key resilience factors, such as flexibility, accessibility, inclusion, and adaptation, that influence the effectiveness of PSs. The results indicate that “Safety (2) empirically assessing and ranking these indicators based on expert and user perspectives; and (3) developing a contextual framework specific to Egyptian cities and similar urban environments, this study advances existing research. These findings offer practical guidance for architects, urban planners, and policymakers to build flexible, inclusive, and resilient PSs capable of facing current and future challenges.
Al-Razaz et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: