PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 4, 2026Fluids2 citationsOpen Access

A Vorticity-Enhanced Physics-Informed Neural Network with Logarithmic Reynolds Embedding

View Full Paper
YZY. H. ZhengFPFei PengZWZhanzhi Wang

Key Points

  • The aim is to enhance modeling of steady cavity flow over a wide range of Reynolds numbers using a novel neural network approach.
  • Proposed a Vorticity-Enhanced Physics-Informed Neural Network (VE-PINN).
  • Augmented a standard velocity-pressure PINN with a vorticity-transport residual.
  • Implemented logarithmic Reynolds-number embedding for training across multiple regimes.
  • Conducted systematic ablation studies on network components and physical constraints.
  • Logarithmic Reynolds-number embedding improved training stability and reduced multi-regime error.
  • Vorticity-transport constraint enhanced reconstruction of velocity fields and vortical structures.
  • VE-PINN showed improved accuracy compared to baseline PINN based on various evaluation metrics.

Abstract

To improve unified modeling of steady two-dimensional lid-driven cavity flow across a wide range of Reynolds numbers, this study proposes a Vorticity-Enhanced Physics-Informed Neural Network (VE-PINN). The method augments a standard velocity-pressure PINN with a vorticity-transport residual and uses a logarithmic Reynolds-number embedding, log10Re, for multi-regime training. Using CFD benchmark data as supervision and evaluation, we conduct systematic ablation studies on network architecture, loss weighting, sampling density, input embedding, and physical constraint over Re=1000−50000, together with out-of-range extrapolation tests. The results show that the logarithmic Reynolds-number embedding improves cross-regime training stability and reduces the multi-regime mean relative error, while the vorticity-transport constraint improves the reconstruction of velocity fields and secondary vortical structures with only a modest increase in training cost. Further comparisons based on contour fields, centerline velocity profiles, vortex-core locations, and vorticity intensity indicate that VE-PINN provides improved accuracy, physical consistency, and generalization relative to the baseline PINN in the present benchmark. These findings suggest that, for the steady cavity-flow problem considered here, combining logarithmic parameter embedding with derivative-level physical constraint is a practical and effective strategy for parametric PINN modeling.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zheng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d0af9a659487ece0fa5a3fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/fluids11040093
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper