Observational case series shows significant pain and disability improvements in low back pain, suggesting rPMS potential.
Despite the high prevalence of low back pain (LBP), evidence supporting the clinical effects of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) remains limited. A combined double-coil and handheld rPMS approach may enhance the therapeutic potential of this technology. This observational case series analyzed prospectively collected routine clinical data from 37 patients treated with a combined protocol of static double-coil lumbar rPMS and dynamic handheld lower-limb rPMS. Pain intensity, disability, and quality of life were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and 1-month follow-up. Statistical analyses were complemented by an evaluation of clinical relevance using established minimal clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds. Significant improvements were observed across all outcomes. Pain decreased by 62.5% post-treatment and by 87.5% at follow-up, while disability was reduced by 86.8% and 92.1%, respectively. Quality of life scores approximately doubled. High MCID responder rates and consistent within-group changes were observed; however, given the single-arm design without a control group, these findings should be interpreted as exploratory and hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory evidence of treatment effectiveness. This combined rPMS approach was feasible and well tolerated in routine clinical practice and was associated with clinically meaningful within-group improvements in pain, function, and quality of life. Further controlled studies are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Modica et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: