Prospective cohort study demonstrates high technical success in gallbladder drainage for contained perforation, indicating potential feasibility.
Background: Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Gallbladder Drainage (EUS-GBD) is usually contraindicated in perforated cholecystitis, although initial reports suggest feasibility in contained perforation (cp-AC). Methods: This prospective single-centre cohort study aimed at exploring EUS-GBD outcomes of patients with cp-AC (type 2 of Niemeier classification). A secondary exploratory comparison was performed with a contemporary cohort of patients with intact gallbladder walls (iw-AC). Results: Between Jan-2021 and Mar-2025, 23 cp-AC patients (39.7% of the overall EUS-GBD cohort) were enrolled. This subgroup showed high prevalence of underlying malignancy (87%) and former ERCP with metal stents (65.2%). Median operative space end interluminal distance were 30.5 [26.0-37.0] mm and 5 [2-8] mm respectively. Technical and Clinical success of EUS-GBD were 100% (85.7%-100.0%) and 87% (67.9%-95.5%) respectively. Adverse Events rate was 21.7% (9.7%-41.9%) and did not significantly differ from the contemporary iw-AC cohort. However, two fatal events were registered in the cp-AC group. Conclusions: EUS-GBD appears technically feasible in patients with contained perforation, despite the additional complexity. However, this represents a particularly high-risk population, and the procedure may be considered for carefully selected patients in expert centers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vanella et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: