Introduces a formal model of systemic error in federated AI systems, suggesting new mitigation strategies.
This paper introduces a formal model for a novel class of systemic error in modern data systems: API-Recursive Drift. I argue that in federated data architectures, where services communicate via Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), each API call acts as a recursive step that can introduce and amplify small, non-malicious errors. The model, grounded in an information-theoretic framework, quantifies this drift as a function of system parameters including initial data integrity (I), model maturity (M), and a newly proposed "API Translation Error" parameter (ψ). This work generalizes the "model collapse" phenomenon to complex, multi-service systems and distinguishes this architectural vulnerability from traditional adversarial attacks and model hallucinations. The paper includes agent-based simulations to explore the model's dynamics and concludes with a set of practical, architectural guidelines for designing and implementing more resilient, high-fidelity AI systems. This research provides a quantitative framework for understanding and mitigating systemic error in any organization building complex, federated data pipelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeremy Weestrand (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: