Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Exploratory framework identifies instability in friction stir welding, suggesting improved monitoring methods.
• A coherence-driven framework is proposed to analyze FSW nonstationary vibrations. • Coherence masking isolates physically correlated spectral components. • Spectral Flatness, Bandwidth, and Centroid quantify stability transitions. • Monte Carlo propagation provides uncertainty for all spectral indicators. • Method discriminates stable, transitional, and unstable FSW regimes. Friction Stir Welding (FSW) exhibits non-stationary vibrations that challenge conventional vibration-based monitoring, where stability indicators are often extracted from single-sensor spectra without formal uncertainty assessment. This study proposes a coherence-filtered spectral framework for the quantitative evaluation of dynamic stability in FSW. Magnitude-squared coherence between translational acceleration and rotational velocity is used as a filtering criterion to restrict feature extraction to dynamically correlated frequency bands. Within these bands, Spectral Flatness (SF), Spectral Bandwidth (BW), and Spectral Centroid (FC) are employed as stability-related descriptors. Experiments conducted on aluminum alloy lap joints at 1400, 1800, and 3200 rpm show that stable regimes are associated with low SF (<0.1), narrow BW (<20 Hz), and relative uncertainties below 10%, whereas unstable conditions exhibit broadband spectra, loss of feature separability, and uncertainty levels up to 30%. Measurement uncertainty is evaluated through Monte Carlo propagation of inertial sensor noise and bias effects following GUM principles. The proposed methodology provides an uncertainty-qualified and measurement-oriented framework for discriminating stable and unstable FSW operating regimes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alteriis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: