Comparative study evaluates prediction of airfoil pressure distribution in aerodynamics, suggesting improved methodologies.
Machine learning has demonstrated significant potential as a valuable tool for aerodynamic design. However, collecting an abundant training set is usually computationally expensive and time-consuming. To address this data scarcity, meta-learning and transfer learning offer viable strategies. Meta-learning enables models to learn efficiently from limited data by leveraging experience across related tasks, while transfer learning reduces data requirements by reusing knowledge from pre-trained models. In addition, integrating physics knowledge into the models provides a complementary path to enhance the reliability and generalizability under data-scarce conditions. This paper studies meta-learning and transfer learning strategies to realize the prediction of supercritical airfoil pressure distribution under multiple free stream conditions with a small-scale dataset. All the models are tested both in the source domain and the target domain. Then, a systematic comparative analysis of different models across different target domain training sample scales is studied. Results show that meta-learning and transfer learning both improve target-domain performance compared to the baseline model. Yet, meta-learning still achieves limited accuracy in the target domain, and data-driven transfer learning exhibits poor generalization. Compared with data-driven models, the Mach number weighted transfer learning model provides more generalized results and higher accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lian et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Aerospace