This analysis outlines six blind spots in AI agent governance, suggesting attestation improves transparency and trust.
Behavioral enforcement in AI agent systems produces six structural blind spots that compound as ecosystems become more open, multi-agent, and multi-workflow. This paper enumerates those blind spots and argues that the governance response must be attestation — not observability. Observability records what the monitored channels show. Attestation produces independently verifiable, tamper-evident evidence of what happened, who authorized it, and what the exposure window was — evidence that external parties can examine without trusting the operator. The distinction matters because the failure modes documented here cause enforcement to actively degrade governance quality: the more rules enforced, the less visible real behavior becomes, and the more confident operators feel about a system that is increasingly opaque. This is the sixth and most dangerous blind spot. The path forward is not stronger constraints. It is a substrate that produces receipts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Narnaiezzsshaa Truong (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: