Historical analysis reveals how lending leads to deposit creation, challenging common economic interpretations.
A recent literature in macroeconomics argues that instead of commercial banks taking in deposits from savers to fund loans, lending itself actually creates deposits. This outcome has been interpreted as lending creating deposits out of thin air or merely because of accounting. I argue that neither interpretation satisfactorily explains the outcome. Rather, I show that a hitherto forgotten explanation from two late nineteenth and early twentieth century scholars can easily demonstrate how lending creates deposits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alex Young (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: