Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 26, 2017Hypertension

Despite accumulating evidence on the clinical relevance of visit-to-visit blood pressure variability, it currently remains a research tool failing to provide clinical application in practice.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Design

Editorial

Authors

ΑΚΑναστάσιος ΚόλλιαςGSGeorge S. StergiouKKKonstantinos G. Kyriakoulis

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Does not support routine clinical use of visit-to-visit BP variability; leaves open prospective trials to establish actionable thresholds.

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Κόλλιας et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1bb63e0d51c2958c2d748https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.117.10087
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure2013 · 28 citations
  2. 2Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients Receiving Intensive Versus Standard Blood Pressure Control: Insights From the STEP Trial2023 · 26 citations
  3. 3Visit‐To‐Visit Blood Pressure Variability: More to Come2015 · 2 citations
  4. 4PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE AND LIMITATION OF VISIT-TO-VISIT BLOOD PRESSURE VARIABILITY IN PATIENTS WITH REDUCED EJECTION FRACTION: A MINI-REVIEW2022
  5. 5Understanding Visit‐to‐Visit Blood Pressure Variability2013 · 1 citations