⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

January 5, 2017Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyOpen Access

The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews from China and the USA are similar

Jinhui Tian Jun Zhang Long Ge Kehu Yang Fujian Song

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

The overall methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews by authors from China are similar to those from the USA, although the quality of systematic reviews from both countries could be further improved.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Tian et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1cc7c3585ec857138f782 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.12.004

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context:

1Artificial intelligence and target trial emulation: toward scalable and credible real-world evidenceJournal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2026
2Risk-of-bias tools for causal inference studies using real-world data: a rapid scoping reviewJournal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2026
3Sex-disparities in survival after anti-PD-1 monotherapy for advanced melanoma in Norway: a population-based cohort studyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2026
4Developing methods guidance for health researchers: literature review of proposed and applied strategiesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2026
5Paper mill or paper mine? A tentative answer to the sharp increase in research papers based on the Global Burden of Disease databaseJournal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2026

Tool for Implementing TArget Trial emulatioNs (TITAN): first version of an open-access design assistantJournal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2026
Evaluating test accuracy study designs for rare and ultra-rare conditions: application to newborn blood spot screeningJournal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2026
Interpreting effect size of patient-reported outcome measures in epilepsy: toward empirical benchmarksJournal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2026
Patient-important outcomes account for fewer than half of reported outcomes and are synthesized differently from surrogate outcomes in rehabilitation systematic reviewsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2026
Partnering with trans and gender diverse youth in health care research: considerations for safe and meaningful engagementJournal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2026

More from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

More from University of East Anglia

More from Lanzhou University

More from Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine