PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología1 citationsOpen Access

Biomass prediction and shoot growth characterization of single-staked yam plants using UAV imagery

KIKohtaro IsekiRMRyo MatsumotoAAAsrat Asfaw

Key Points

  • The study aims to estimate shoot biomass and characterize growth patterns in single-staked yams using UAV imagery.
  • Utilized multi-angle aerial images from nadir and oblique views
  • Extracted vegetation- and height-related indices as predictors
  • Applied machine learning models, primarily support vector regression
  • Conducted time-series biomass estimates with genotype-specific growth curve fitting
  • Support vector regression achieved a prediction accuracy of R² = 0.79
  • Combined-view imagery outperformed single-view imaging
  • Observed significant genotypic variations in maximum biomass and early growth rate
  • Richards growth curves indicated genotype-specific growth dynamics

Abstract

This study presents an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based approach for estimating shoot biomass and characterizing growth patterns in single-staked white Guinea yams ( Dioscorea rotundata ). Multi-angle aerial images from nadir and oblique views were used to extract vegetation- and height-related indices that served as predictors in machine learning models. Support vector regression using combined-view imagery provided the highest prediction accuracy (R² = 0.79) and remained robust across growth stages, years, fertilizer treatments, and genotypes. Notably, the combined-view configuration outperformed single-view imaging, demonstrating the advantage of capturing complementary canopy-structure information in complex staked-vine canopies. Time-series biomass estimates enabled the fitting of genotype-specific Richards growth curves using Bayesian inference. Significant genotypic variations were observed in parameters associated with maximum biomass and early growth rate, whereas phenology-related parameters showed comparatively minimal differences. These parameter differences may reflect variation in canopy architecture and growth allocation among genotypes. Overall, this integrated workflow provides a scalable tool for nondestructive monitoring of yam growth dynamics and for summarizing biomass trajectories with interpretable parameters, supporting breeding efforts aimed at improving yam productivity and yield stability across diverse cultivation conditions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Iseki et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fb20a79560c99a0a18cfhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2026.1776315
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Impact of different planting date on shoot growth and tuber development of white Guinea yam grown in Guinea Savanna2024 · 3 citations
  2. 2Novel algorithms for remote estimation of vegetation fraction2002 · 2,202 citations
  3. 3Growth and Nutrient Use Efficiencies of Yams (Dioscoreaspp.) Grown in Two Contrasting Soils of West Africa2011 · 30 citations
  4. 4A mechanistic model for nitrogen-limited plant growth2022 · 11 citations
  5. 5Simple sequence repeat‐based mini‐core collection for white Guinea yam (Dioscorea rotundata) germplasm2020 · 18 citations