Key result
High Body Roundness Index linked to ~77% higher odds of prevalent stroke versus low index.
Why the study?
While central adiposity may contribute to vascular risk, the role of the body roundness index in community screening populations is not well defined.
Does high Body Roundness Index (BRI) associate with increased prevalent stroke in community-dwelling adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=6,858)
No
Does high Body Roundness Index (BRI) associate with increased prevalent stroke in community-dwelling adults?
Effect estimate: OR 1.766 (95% CI 1.279-2.438)
Absolute Event Rate: 4.2% vs 2.1%
p-value: p=0.00055
High Body Roundness Index (≥4.6) is significantly associated with increased odds of prevalent stroke and provides modest incremental discriminatory value beyond traditional risk factors in community screening.
Adds modest discriminatory value beyond traditional factors in community stroke screening; extends observational evidence but leaves open causality pending prospective studies.
Background Stroke remains a major cause of disability and death. While central adiposity may contribute to vascular risk, the role of the body roundness index (BRI) (a waist-height-derived anthropometric indicator) in community screening populations is not well defined. We therefore investigated the association between BRI and prevalent stroke in a community-based screening sample. Methods Using data from a ChinaHEART cohort branch (6,858 adults), BRI was calculated from anthropometric measurements. Prevalent stroke was ascertained by self-reported physician diagnosis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the optimal BRI cutoff. Logistic regression, adjusted for age, sex, marital status, smoking, alcohol use, hypertension, diabetes, blood pressure, fasting glucose, and lipid parameters, was performed to examine the association between BRI and prevalent stroke. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis and subgroup/interaction analyses were further conducted. Results Among 6,858 participants, 192 (2.8%) reported prior stroke. The bootstrap-derived BRI cutoff was 4.597 (95% CI 4.149–4.798). High BRI (≥4.6) was associated with higher odds of prevalent stroke in the fully adjusted model (OR 1.766, 95% CI 1.279–2.438). BRI alone showed limited discrimination (AUC 0.584), while multivariable models achieved higher AUC (0.740 in the fully adjusted model). Adding BRI produced ΔAUC increases. RCS showed no evidence of nonlinearity. Conclusions Our findings support BRI as a simple, non-invasive anthropometric measure that may offer complementary discriminatory information for community screening/triage; prospective studies with validated outcomes are warranted to confirm clinical utility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Prevalent stroke (n=6,858). High Body Roundness Index (BRI ≥4.6) vs. Low Body Roundness Index (BRI <4.6) was evaluated on Prevalent stroke (self-reported physician-diagnosed) (OR 1.766, 95% CI 1.279-2.438, p=0.00055). High Body Roundness Index (≥4.6) was significantly associated with increased odds of prevalent stroke (OR 1.766) compared to low index values in a community screening population.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: