An experiment shows that negative information reduces generalized trust in collectivist settings, suggesting implications for cultural understanding.
Generalized trust refers to individuals’ trust in members of society at large. Previous research highlights negativity bias as a central obstacle to trust development: trust is easily destroyed but difficult to build. Yet, most evidence for this bias comes from Western, individualistic contexts. This study examines whether such findings generalize to collectivist settings. Using a preregistered online experiment in China, I show that negative information about others’ untrustworthiness lowers generalized trust more than positive information raises it, which indicates a clear negativity bias in the Chinese setting. The experiment also includes a cultural priming manipulation designed to test whether making collectivistic versus individualistic considerations salient moderates this asymmetry. The preregistered analyses, however, do not reveal a statistically significant moderation effect of the priming on negativity bias. I discuss the implications of this null result and outline directions for future research on how cultural value orientations may shape negativity biases in generalized trust.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baowen Liang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: