PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2026Frontiers in Pediatrics0 citationsOpen Access

Efficacy of a reduced brace wear regimen supported by Schroth exercise in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a randomized trial

View Full Paper
FMFanyuan MengKunming Medical UniversityKLKerong LiKunming Medical UniversityMCMoxian ChenNanjing Forestry University

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate whether a reduced brace wear duration, complemented by Schroth exercise, offers similar long-term curve correction and enhanced quality of life compared to full-time bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.
  • 52 adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis were randomly assigned to full-time brace wear or part-time brace wear plus Schroth exercise.
  • The Schroth exercise involved home-based and supervised sessions, conducted at least 5 times per week for a minimum of 4–5 hours weekly.
  • Evaluations included Cobb angle, angle of trunk rotation, thoracic expansion, and SRS-22 questionnaire scores at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months.
  • Both groups showed significant reductions in Cobb angle from baseline at the 6- and 12-month follow-ups.
  • The experimental group had superior improvement in Cobb angle compared to the control group.
  • Secondary outcomes showed greater improvement in angle of trunk rotation, thoracic expansion, and SRS-22 pain and mental health scores for the experimental group at 6 months.

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to determine whether reducing daily brace wear duration, when compensated by intensive Schroth exercise, yields non-inferior long-term curve correction and superior quality of life compared to standard full-time bracing in AIS. Methods A total of 52 AIS patients (Cobb angle 25°–40°) were randomly and equally assigned to a control group (full-time brace wear, 20–24 h/day) and an experimental group (part-time brace wear, 14–18 h/day combined with Schroth exercise). Specifically, the Schroth three-dimensional exercise including home-based and supervised outpatient sessions, were performed at least 5 times per week, with a minimum total duration of 4–5 h per week. Evaluations of Cobb angle, angle of trunk rotation (ATR), thoracic expansion, and the Scoliosis Research Society 22-item (SRS-22) questionnaire were conducted baseline and after 6 months of treatment. A subsequent follow-up assessment at 12-months was carried out, with the Cobb angle employed as the primary outcome to evaluate the long-term corrective efficacy between the two groups. Results The two-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant Time × Group interaction for the primary outcome, the Cobb angle ( P 0.001). At both the 6- and 12-month follow-ups, the Cobb angle was significantly reduced from baseline in both groups ( P 0.01), with the experimental group demonstrating superior improvement compared to the control group ( P 0.01). Regarding secondary outcomes at 6 months, the experimental group also showed significantly greater improvement than the control group in the ATR, thoracic expansion, and the pain and mental health domains of the SRS-22 ( P 0.05). Furthermore, within the experimental group, ATR, thoracic expansion, and the pain and mental health domains of the SRS-22 improved significantly from baseline at 6 months ( P 0.01), whereas in the control group, only the Cobb angle and ATR showed significant improvement ( P 0.01). Conclusions This short-term study provides evidence that a protocol prioritizing intensive Schroth exercise combined with part-time bracing achieved superior corrective efficacy compared to full-time bracing alone for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. These findings support integrating structured Schroth therapy as a core component within a part-time bracing regimen, suggesting a potential to reduce reliance on full-time wear while maintaining efficacy in the short term. Clinical Trial Registration https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=201861 , identifier ChiCTR2300075910.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Meng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fc28a79560c99a0a1bd5https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2026.1774281
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper