Pioneering study demonstrates efficient removal of NO and Hg in flue gas using waste-derived catalysts, suggesting cost-effective pollution control methods.
• Pioneering use of waste-derived catalyst for removal of multiple pollutants. • Explores NO/NH 3 /Hg 0 interactions on waste-derived catalysts. • Unveils the inhibitory mechanism of NO and NH 3 co-existence in HgO reduction. • Presents low-cost, eco-friendly catalyst design advancing green chemistry. The coexistence of NO x and elemental mercury (Hg 0 ) in flue gas presents a significant challenge for pollution control, underscoring the need for the development of cost-effective and integrated removal technologies. In this study, we synthesized a Cu-Ce-SSZ-13 zeolite catalyst derived from coal fly ash, which achieved simultaneous and efficient removal of both NO and Hg 0 at a temperature of 250 °C, with conversion rates reaching 100% for both pollutants. To understand the synergistic reaction mechanism, we systematically investigated the interactions among NO, ammonia (NH 3 ), and Hg 0 during the reaction process. The findings indicate that Hg 0 has minimal impact on the removal of NO within the mid-temperature range, while NO actively promotes the oxidation of Hg 0 . Conversely, NH 3 appears to inhibit Hg 0 removal by consuming surface-active oxygen species and competing for adsorption sites. Additionally, the presence of both NO and NH 3 can reduce already formed mercury oxide (HgO), further exacerbating the inhibition effect. The synergistic relationship between the NO-selective catalytic reduction (SCR) cycle and the Hg 0 oxidation pathway was further elucidated through X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) and in situ Diffuse Reflectance Infrared Fourier Transform Spectroscopy (DRIFTS) analyses. This study clarifies the critical role of gas-phase components in the simultaneous removal process and offers theoretical guidance for designing efficient and low-cost integrated catalysts aimed at multi-pollutant purification. Furthermore, it demonstrates a feasible approach that combines the resource utilization of fly ash with green catalysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: