This analysis evaluates radiological protection measures and their alignment with sustainable development in England, suggesting implications for future practices.
The radiological protection principles of justification, optimisation and dose limits are applied through national legislation to safeguard workers, the public and the environment from the short and long‑term effects of ionising radiation. This paper analyses how these principles, as implemented in England, align with differing interpretations of sustainable development. This analysis finds that the framework is oriented toward sustaining all natural capital by applying stronger sustainability for human protection and nearly strong sustainability for non‑human species. It is argued that the 1mSv/yr public dose limit is representative of an environmental limit and is a potential candidate 'safe operating space' for ionising radiation within the novel entities' planetary boundary. Circumstances are also identified during low radiological risk activities such as decommissioning and remediation where very strong sustainability may be applied. Further research is therefore recommended to test the use of the 1mSv/yr limit as a global safe operating space and to define clearer criteria to understand and control transitions from stronger to very strong sustainability in low radiological risk activities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Craig Ashton (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: