Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis compares urinary biomarkers to predict delayed graft function in kidney transplant recipients, suggesting better monitoring methods.
Recipients of donation after circulatory death (DCD) kidneys are at high risk for delayed graft function (DGF) due to severe ischemia-reperfusion injury. We compared urinary biomarkers in predicting the duration of DGF with the tubular function slope (TFS) as the gold standard. In 89 DCD kidney transplant recipients, urinary TIMP-2, IGFBP7, B2M, NGAL, KIM1, CXCL9, and UMOD were quantified by LC-MS/MS analysis on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 4 and 10. Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IF/TA) were assessed with protocol biopsies at POD 10. TFS was calculated with Tc-99m-MAG3 renography. Predictive performance was compared with AUCs from ROC analyses. Of all 89 recipients, 22% experienced no (<7), 22% mild (>= 7-14), 29% moderate (>= 14-<21) and 26% severe (>= 21 days) fDGF. The OR for the presence of IF/TA was 1.9 (95% CI:0.4; 10.0) for mild to moderate and 15.0 (95% CI:2.7; 84.8) for severe compared to no fDGF. At POD 4, urinary NGAL and fractional NGAL excretion (FE-NGAL) outperformed TFS and other biomarkers in predicting fDGF with AUCs of 0.97, 0.98 and 0.92, respectively. At POD10, FE-NGAL and PCR best predicted severe vs. mild to moderate fDGF, with AUCs of 0.74 and 0.76 versus 0.65 for TFS. Therefore, urinary NGAL and FE-NGAL may provide a viable alternative to (99m)TcMAG3 renography for monitoring fDGF clearance or guiding kidney transplant biopsy to exclude additional acute rejection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rooij et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: