PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2026Cancer Research0 citations

Abstract 5917: Single-cell profiling of NK cells in chronic myeloid leukemia identifies distinct cell states with gene regulatory signatures associated with differential outcomes after imatinib discontinuation

View Full Paper
SBSantoshi BorraIndiana University BloomingtonDYDa YanIndiana University BloomingtonRWRobert S. WelnerUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham

Key Points

  • This research aims to identify the immunogenomic mechanisms that distinguish successful treatment-free remission (TFR) from relapse in chronic myeloid leukemia after discontinuing imatinib.
  • Reanalyzed single-cell RNA transcriptomes of NK cells from CML patients
  • Used unsupervised clustering and pseudotime trajectory inference
  • Reconstructed gene regulatory networks and applied AI-guided gene analysis
  • Distinct transcription factor modules found related to NK cell activation and exhaustion
  • TFR patients showed increased activity in specific regulatory modules compared to relapsing patients
  • AI-guided analysis identified a gene regulatory panel that distinguished between TFR, late relapse, and early relapse groups

Abstract

Abstract Background: Treatment-free remission (TFR) is an emerging therapeutic goal in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), achieved by ∼40% of patients who discontinue tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy after maintaining a deep molecular response. However, the immunogenomic mechanisms that distinguish sustained remission from molecular relapse remain incompletely defined. Previous single-cell RNA (scRNA-seq) and TCR sequencing studies revealed that CML is characterized by an expanded population of activated CD56dim natural killer (NK) cells and anti-PR1 T cells that mediate anti-leukemic immunity. Methods: Building on these findings, we reanalyzed NK cell transcriptomes from six CML patients, two with early relapse, two with late relapse, and two maintaining durable TFR, using an integrated computational framework combining unsupervised clustering, pseudotime trajectory inference, gene regulatory network (GRN) reconstruction, and artificial intelligence-assisted gene panel discovery. Longitudinal samples collected at TKI discontinuation and at 6- and 12-month post-therapy were analyzed to delineate transcriptional dynamics and regulatory drivers of immune outcomes. Results: Comparative GRN modeling revealed distinct transcription factor modules governing NK cell activation, differentiation, and exhaustion. Patients maintaining TFR exhibited higher activity in RUNX3, EOMES, ELK4, and REL regulons, whereas relapse cases showed modules enriched for FOSL2 and MAF with inflammatory/translational targets. Pseudotime analysis revealed altered state-transition kinetics between functional NK subtypes, with accelerated exhaustion trajectories in relapsing patients. An AI-guided gene prioritization model further identified a gene NK cell regulatory panel, including previously uncharacterized transcriptional mediators that robustly separated TFR, late relapse, and early relapse groups. Pathway enrichment linked these genes to IFN-γ signaling, metabolic reprogramming, and immunoregulatory feedback networks. Conclusions: This integrative reanalysis highlights transcriptional control and regulatory network rewiring as key determinants of immune persistence versus exhaustion following TKI cessation. The AI-derived gene panel provides a scalable framework for exploratory biomarker discovery and mechanistic stratification of CML remission outcomes. Together, these findings advance our understanding of the immune architecture underlying successful TFR and identify candidate transcriptional targets to improve remission durability in CML. Citation Format: Santoshi Borra, Da Yan, Robert S. Welner, Zongliang Yue. Single-cell profiling of NK cells in chronic myeloid leukemia identifies distinct cell states with gene regulatory signatures associated with differential outcomes after imatinib discontinuation abstract. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 5917.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Borra et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fd13a79560c99a0a2dcchttps://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-5917
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper