PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2026Cancer Research0 citations

Abstract 2765: Microbiome foundation modeling of cancer: MiFM-derived continuous trajectories and risk clocks for pan-cancer immunotherapy response prediction.

View Full Paper
HSHongru ShenYBYajing BiYZYan Zong

Key Points

  • The research aims to develop a microbiome model that predicts cancer progression and immunotherapy responses using MiFM embeddings.
  • Developed MiFM framework using 2 million microbiome profiles.
  • Derived disease pseudotime and microbiome cancer risk clock from MiFM embeddings.
  • Evaluated model in colorectal cancer and pan-cancer immune checkpoint blockade cohorts.
  • Analyzed correlation between microbiome aging acceleration signature and cancer trajectories.
  • Disease pseudotime accurately reflected cancer progression with significant p-values.
  • Risk clock identified high-risk individuals among normal mucosa with AUC values of 0.85 and 0.92 for adenomas and carcinomas, respectively.
  • MiFM model distinguished non-responders to immune checkpoint blockade with cross-cohort AUC of 0.84 and 0.95 in non-small cell lung cancer.
  • Aging acceleration signature correlated with disease pseudotime and risk clock, predicting overall survival (HR = 2.52).

Abstract

Abstract Background: The human microbiome shapes cancer risk, progression and response to immunotherapy, but most existing microbiome models are task-specific and fail to generalize across cohorts and sequencing platforms. We developed MiFM (Microbiome Foundation Model), a self-supervised Transformer trained on ∼2 million human, animal and environmental microbiome profiles. MiFM encodes communities as multi-level tokens (species, genus and functional pathways) and uses masked reconstruction plus contrastive learning to obtain transferable embeddings that capture taxonomic and functional structure. Here, we evaluated whether MiFM embeddings can support continuous, clinically interpretable readouts of cancer trajectories and immunotherapy response. Methods: From MiFM embeddings we derived two continuous metrics: (1) a disease pseudotime placing each patient along a microbiome-encoded cancer progression trajectory; and (2) a microbiome cancer risk clock estimating microbiome-derived cancer risk and immunotherapy non-response at the individual level. We applied this framework to colorectal cancer (CRC) cohorts spanning normal mucosa, adenoma and carcinoma, and to 12 independent pan-cancer immune checkpoint blockade cohorts (n =1237). We additionally defined a microbiome-based aging acceleration signature and evaluated its association with disease pseudotime, the risk clock and overall survival. Results: In CRC, disease pseudotime recapitulated the adenoma-carcinoma sequence, with median values of 0.15 (normal), 0.38 (adenoma) and 0.72 (carcinoma; p 0.001), and separated disease states more clearly than conventional stage. The risk clock identified high-risk individuals within histologically normal mucosa whose microbiome embeddings resembled adenomas (AUC = 0.85) or carcinomas (AUC = 0.92), indicating a preclinical window for intervention. Across 15 CRC cohorts (n = 3739), baseline gut microbiome embeddings identified non-responders to immune checkpoint blockade with a median cross-cohort AUC of 0.84 and an AUC of 0.95 in a non-small cell lung cancer cohort. The aging acceleration signature correlated with both disease pseudotime and the risk clock and independently predicted overall survival (HR = 2.52, p 0.001). Conclusions: To our knowledge, MiFM is the first large-scale microbiome foundation model applied to oncology, yielding continuous microbiome-derived readouts of cancer progression and immunotherapy response. The disease pseudotime and microbiome cancer risk clock capture cancer trajectories beyond conventional staging, enable ultra-early identification of high-risk lesions in normal-appearing mucosa and support robust prediction of immunotherapy resistance across cohorts. This framework delivers concrete microbiome biomarkers and a scalable platform for microbiome-guided precision oncology. Citation Format: Hongru Shen, Yajing Bi, Yan Zong, Zhangyan Lyu, Chao Zhang, Kexin Chen, Xiangchun Li, . Microbiome foundation modeling of cancer: MiFM-derived continuous trajectories and risk clocks for pan-cancer immunotherapy response prediction abstract. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 2765.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fd29a79560c99a0a2f89https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-2765
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Abstract 4905: Microbiome-wide association study identifies crosstalk between tumor-associated microbes and the human tumor microenvironment2026
  2. 2Abstract 6469: Longitudinal loss of microbiome stability is associated with poor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer and melanoma2026
  3. 3Abstract 3753: Uncovering tumor microbial and immune biomarkers of immunotherapy response in lung cancer2026
  4. 4Abstract 1116: A scalable multimodal framework for unbiased risk biomarker discovery across multiple cancer types2026
  5. 5Comprehensively dissecting onco‐microbiome: Intriguing connection of the microbiome to cancer metastasis2024