PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2026Cancer Research0 citations

Abstract 3279: Metabolomic profiling reveals plasma LPC as an indicator of systemic inflammation and immunotherapy response in squamous cell carcinoma

View Full Paper
TITomoyuki IwasakiHSHidekazu ShirotaEHEiji Hishinuma

Key Points

  • This research investigates the role of plasma lysophosphatidylcholines in systemic inflammation and its association with treatment response in squamous cell carcinoma patients.
  • Conducted a multi-omics analysis of plasma from 149 patients with advanced esophageal or head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
  • Quantified 635 metabolites and evaluated clinical, proteomic, and cytokine datasets.
  • Performed weighted gene correlation network analysis to identify metabolite groups related to inflammation and prognosis.
  • Lysophosphatidylcholines levels were significantly reduced in patients with high inflammatory burden and poor prognosis.
  • Low LPC levels were correlated with decreased overall survival, particularly in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.
  • Biological analysis showed that low LPC levels were associated with increased inflammatory markers and cytokines.

Abstract

Abstract Cancer is increasingly recognized as a systemic disease characterized not only by local tumor growth but also by widespread metabolic and immunologic disturbances that shape disease progression and treatment response. To clarify systemic metabolic alterations associated with prognosis and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), we conducted an integrated multi-omics analysis of plasma from 149 patients with advanced or recurrent esophageal or head and neck SCC. Targeted metabolomics quantified 635 metabolites, which were combined with detailed clinical, proteomic, and cytokine datasets. Weighted gene correlation network analysis revealed a single metabolite group—lysophosphatidylcholines (LPCs)—as most strongly associated with the Glasgow Prognostic Score, a marker of systemic inflammation and patient survival. Across nearly all measurable LPC species, plasma levels were markedly reduced in patients with elevated inflammatory burden and poor prognosis. LPC concentrations showed minimal correlation with tumor size, treatment line, or performance status, indicating that LPC reduction reflects host systemic conditions rather than tumor burden or treatment exposure. Survival analysis demonstrated that patients with low LPC levels had significantly shorter overall survival, with the strongest association observed in those receiving ICIs. Among ICI-treated patients, especially those treated in the first-line setting, low LPC levels identified individuals with minimal therapeutic benefit, whereas LPC levels were not prognostic in patients never exposed to ICIs. To explore the biological context of LPC loss, we analyzed plasma proteomic and cytokine profiles. Proteomic signatures in the low-LPC group revealed enrichment of pathways related to inflammation, innate immunity, and coagulation activation; levels of CRP, serum amyloid A, and other acute-phase reactants were substantially increased. Cytokine profiling demonstrated that low LPC levels were accompanied by elevated IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α, further supporting the presence of systemic chronic inflammation. Conversely, chemokines such as CCL2 and CXCL8 were higher in patients with preserved LPC levels. Together, these multi-omics findings indicate that decreased LPC marks a systemic pro-inflammatory and immunosuppressive state that undermines antitumor immunity and reduces responsiveness to PD-1 blockade. Citation Format: Tomoyuki Iwasaki, Hidekazu Shirota, Eiji Hishinuma, Naomi Matsukawa, Yuki Kasahara, Hisato Kawakami. Metabolomic profiling reveals plasma LPC as an indicator of systemic inflammation and immunotherapy response in squamous cell carcinoma abstract. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 3279.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Iwasaki et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fd62a79560c99a0a3552https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-3279
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper