Retrospective study describes outcomes of small fetal hepatic lesions, indicating prognosis depends on anomalies and growth restriction.
Objective To describe prenatal characteristics and postnatal outcomes of fetal hepatic lesions diagnosed on prenatal ultrasound and to identify prognostic factors of this condition. Methods A retrospective study was conducted in a cohort of fetuses diagnosed with hepatic lesions between 2011 and 2023 at a tertiary referral center. Prenatal and postnatal data were collected, including lesion type, size, gestational age at detection, associated anomalies, genetic abnormalities, growth restriction and pregnancy outcomes. Postnatal follow-up included imaging, lesion resolution and overall health status. Results 65 fetuses were identified. Most lesions were echogenic (n=55); a minority were cystic (n=7), mixed (n=1) or subcapsular hematomas (n=2). Multiple lesions were present in 38%. Stillbirths, including fetal death and pregnancy termination, occurred in 18%, predominantly in the setting of major associated anomalies, fetal growth restriction and/or genetic abnormalities. Of 48 liveborn infants, 96% were healthy at discharge. Among 31 infants followed postnatally, 75% showed lesion resolution by 21 months. At the 5-year median follow-up, 79% were healthy. Echogenic lesions were more common in healthy infants, while a cystic component was associated with a higher rate of concurrent clinically significant health conditions, although liver function was typically normal. Conclusion Isolated small echogenic fetal hepatic lesions display a favorable prognosis with spontaneous resolution in most cases. Adverse pregnancy outcomes are common in cases with associated anomalies, fetal growth restriction and genetic abnormalities; therefore, counseling should be guided by a comprehensive anomaly assessment and appropriate genetic evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heiman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: