Mixed-methods evaluation reveals Brain in Hand reduces anxiety in autistic, ADHD, and neurotypical students, suggesting effective support pathways.
Purpose Student anxiety in UK higher education has risen in recent years, straining university services. This study aims to examine whether, and how, Brain in Hand (BiH) – a hybrid human–digital support tool – is associated with reduced anxiety in autistic and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) students, and neurotypical students. Design/methodology/approach Seventy-two university students (60 autistic and/or ADHD students) completed baseline and six-month surveys assessing anxiety and hypothesised pathways: coping (ability to manage overwhelm and ability to cope with day-to-day stressors), cognitive challenges and social participation. Within-person change in anxiety was modelled as a function of change in these candidate mechanisms. Reflexive thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews elaborated pathways and the perceived contribution of BiH. Findings Greater improvements in coping, reductions in cognitive challenges and reduced participation-related difficulties were each associated with greater anxiety improvement. Qualitative themes clarified these pathways: reactive in-the-moment coping and developing awareness of long-term patterns; planning/structuring daily life and scaffolding anxiety management; and increased participation/reduced isolation and earlier, more effective help-seeking. Practical implications Findings support integrating guided digital supports like BiH as scalable complements to university provision, particularly where designs reduce cognitive burden, scaffold participation and are responsive to autistic/ADHD people’s needs. Originality/value In a largely autistic and ADHD cohort, BiH use was associated with anxiety improvement, and mixed-methods integration illuminated plausible emotional, cognitive and social mechanisms of change. This study advances a mechanism-focused, neuroinclusive evaluation of hybrid digital support in higher education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scott et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: