PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2026Cancer Research0 citations

Abstract 64: Mechanisms of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors: Insights from single-cell nucleus sequencing and spatial transcriptomics.

View Full Paper
SBSeung-eun BangYonsei UniversityEKEunChae KimYonsei UniversityWRWon-Ji Ryu

Key Points

  • This research aims to uncover the mechanisms driving resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors in luminal B breast cancer.
  • Conducted single-nucleus RNA sequencing on paired tumor biopsies pre- and post-treatment.
  • Performed spatial transcriptomic analysis to visualize cell-type distribution.
  • Applied differential expression analysis to identify changes in immune and tumor cell populations.
  • Utilized UMAP projection to analyze cellular composition and reprogramming.
  • Identified a marked increase in innate lymphoid cells post-treatment.
  • Observed substantial transcriptional reprogramming in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.
  • Noted minimal changes in endothelial and fibroblast cell populations.
  • Detected subtype redistribution in tumor/epithelial cells after CDK4/6 inhibition.

Abstract

Abstract Breast cancer incidence is increasing worldwide and represents the second most common malignancy in women after lung cancer. Among its subtypes, luminal B accounts for 10-20% of cases and shows a faster proliferation rate. Also, a poorer prognosis than luminal A, with a 5-year survival rate of only 32% at stage 4. Luminal B tumors are characterized by active estrogen receptor signaling and high expression of proliferation-associated genes such as Ki-67 and E2F, leading to enhanced estrogen-driven cell cycle progression. Consequently, CDK4/6 inhibitors, which block the G1 to S phase transition, have shown favorable therapeutic outcomes. However, in a subset of patients, treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors induces a luminal-to-basal-like phenotypic conversion, which is associated with poor clinical prognosis. To elucidate the mechanism underlying this phenotype, we performed single-nucleus RNA sequencing and spatial transcriptomic analyses on paired pre- and post-treatment tumor biopsies from three patients who exhibited poor responses to CDK4/6 inhibition. After UMAP projection and batch correction, cell type annotation revealed no major changes in the overall cellular composition, with epithelial/tumor cells remaining dominant. Differential expression analysis showed minimal transcriptional changes in endothelial and fibroblast cells but substantial alterations in tumor/epithelial and immune cell populations. Focusing on immune cells, which displayed the largest number of DEGs, subclustering analysis revealed a marked post-treatment increase in innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), while overall immune cell numbers decreased following treatment. Cell-type-specific DEG analysis further identified substantial transcriptional reprogramming within plasma cells, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells. In parallel, tumor/epithelial cells exhibited distinct subtype redistribution after CDK4/6 inhibition, which is currently under detailed characterization. Spatial transcriptomic mapping based on nucleus-seq-derived cell type signatures is underway to visualize cell-type distribution and microenvironmental remodeling before and after treatment. Collectively, our integrative analyses aim to uncover the mechanisms of CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance, highlighting the potential roles of ILC expansion, immune remodeling, and epithelial plasticity in luminal-to-basal transition, and to identify biomarkers predictive of therapeutic response. Citation Format: Seung-eun Bang, EunChae Kim, Won-Ji Ryu, Hyein Jung, Yoonjin Cha, Joohyuk Sohn, Gun Min Kim, Kyoo Hyun Kim, Byungjin Hwang, Min Hwan Kim. Mechanisms of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors: Insights from single-cell nucleus sequencing and spatial transcriptomics abstract. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 64.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fd8ea79560c99a0a3acehttps://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-64
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper