PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 20266 citationsOpen Access

AIRT Anti-Plagiarism Prompt: Front End User Sovereign Integrity

View Full Paper
KGKian Tik Go

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop and field-test a new AI-mediated protocol for detecting and auditing academic plagiarism from the Front-End User perspective.
  • Developed AIRT v4.1 using three integrated layers: Book Smart, Street Smart, and Unifying Principles.
  • Introduced a weighted scoring rubric and audit report template.
  • Field-tested against four academic papers submitted to UN Open Source Week 2026.
  • Achieved an average originality score of 8.25/10 across tested papers.
  • All papers received CLEAN status, indicating high originality.

Abstract

This paper presents AIRT (Anti-plagiarism Prompt for Integrity Research and Transparency) v4.1 — a structured AI-mediated protocol for detecting and auditing academic plagiarism, developed from the Front-End User (FEU) perspective. Unlike conventional BEU-centric (Back-End User) tools such as Turnitin or iThenticate that rely on database string-matching, AIRT leverages the full qualitative and quantitative capacity of Large Language Models (LLMs) as Probabilistic Meaning Mediators operating at 70–88% cognitive load. The framework introduces three integrated layers: Book Smart (academic standards A1–A4), Street Smart (FEU operational reality B1–B5), and Unifying Principles (C1–C4), culminating in a reproducible weighted scoring rubric (0–10 scale) and a structured audit report template. A critical revision in v4.1 separates AIGC declaration into two independent fields — Author Declaration (FEU/human) and Lingua's Impression (AI estimate from text patterns) — eliminating the paradox of AI self-reporting. The framework was field-tested against four papers submitted to UN Open Source Week 2026, yielding an average originality score of 8.25/10 with CLEAN status across all four. AIRT v4.1 is positioned as an open-source, accessible academic integrity tool for independent researchers operating within budget constraints, grounded in the philosophical principle of 自主者 (Zì Zhǔ Zhě): sovereignty of mind and integrity of thought.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kian Tik Go (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fd9ca79560c99a0a3c7bhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19406428
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Field Observations on AI-Detection Practices in Academic Institutions and a Proposal for Process-Based Academic Integrity Verification2026
  2. 2Enhancing Academic Integrity for Bangladesh's Educational Landscape2024
  3. 3Challenges of Maintaining Academic Integrity in the AI Era2026
  4. 4The Integrity Paradox: Reflections on Epistemic Substitution and the Ethical Failure of Plagiarism Detection Systems2026
  5. 5Deployment of AI Tools and Technologies on Academic Integrity and Research2024 · 3 citations