Key result
Community health worker education improves CRC genetic knowledge by ~2.7 correct answers vs standard materials.
Why the study?
Knowledge and awareness of colorectal cancer prevention and genetic testing remain limited in many Los Angeles County communities.
Does an educational session by specialized community health workers improve colorectal cancer genetic knowledge and prevention behaviors in Hispanic/Latine adults?
RCT (n=138)
Single-blind
Randomized
No
Does an educational session by specialized community health workers improve colorectal cancer genetic knowledge and prevention behaviors in Hispanic/Latine adults?
Effect estimate: 2.7 more correct answers
p-value: p=<0.01
Deploying CRC prevention trained educators in a community setting improves CRC genetic knowledge and dietary behaviors among Hispanic/Latine adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Supports community health worker education for CRC prevention in Hispanic/Latine adults; extends RCT evidence to underserved groups.
Introduction: Knowledge and awareness of colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention and genetic testing remain limited in many Los Angeles County (LAC) communities. To address this, we trained 42 CRC-specialized community health workers (CoGENES) through a train-the-trainer program. We present preliminary results of a community-based randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the impact of materials and training delivered by CoGENES as part of an NCI funded PE-CGS network program at USC. Methods: A two-armed, single blinded RCT was launched in August 2024. Participants are ≥ 18 years of age and residents of LAC. The intervention included the delivery of an educational session by CoGENES and an a priori developed educational handbook. The control group received standard CRC and genetic testing materials. Data on demographics, acculturation, cultural values and fatalism, health literacy, numeracy, generalized self-efficacy (GSE), genomic knowledge, cancer prevention behaviors and attitudes, were collected at baseline with validated or team-developed surveys. Follow-up surveys at 6-12 weeks and 6-8 months after intervention receipt evaluate changes in GSE, genomic knowledge, and cancer prevention behaviors. Paired dietary changes were evaluated using McNemar’s test. Paired t-tests and independent t-tests were used to compare baseline and follow-up results within and between arms, respectively. Results: A total of 138 participants (mean age = 48.8 years, SD = 13.6) were randomized to the intervention (n = 72) or control (n = 66) arm, with no baseline differences. All were Hispanic/Latine, most were female (83%), Mexican (64%), Catholic (61%), married (50%), completed ≤11th grade education (51%), and spoke primarily Spanish (69%). Interim analyses showed that by 6-8 weeks, participants in the intervention arm demonstrated improved dietary behaviors, with a higher proportion limiting processed food intake (rarely or never: 48.6% at baseline vs 69.8% at follow-up; p <0.05). We observed significant improvements in cancer genetic knowledge within the intervention arm at 6-12 weeks, with more correct answers (mean difference = 4.32; p <0.01), and fewer “don’t know” responses (mean difference = -5.40; p<0.01). These improvements were greater than in the control arm: 2.7 more correct answers (p<0.01) and 3.25 fewer “don’t know” responses (p<0.01). Genetic literacy and comprehension scores also improved (mean difference = 11.38; p < 0.01), though not significantly more than in the control group (difference-in-differences = 2.20; p = 0.43). Conclusion: We present preliminary evidence that deploying CRC prevention trained educators in a community setting, may improve CRC genetic knowledge, and highlights opportunities and willingness to improve lifestyle and dietary patterns to reduce CRC incidence. Citation Format: Bianca Rosales, Diego Alvarez-Lopez, Janet Rodriguez, Joel Sanchez Mendez, Charité N. Ricker, Rosa Barahona, Heinz Josef Lenz, Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati, Mariana C. Stern. Preliminary results of a community-based randomized controlled trial to raise colorectal cancer awareness: The Community Genetic Navigation Engagement Specialist (CoGENES) Program [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 923.
Rosales et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Colorectal cancer awareness and prevention (n=138). Educational session by CoGENES and educational handbook vs. Standard CRC and genetic testing materials was evaluated on Cancer genetic knowledge (correct answers) at 6-12 weeks (2.7 more correct answers, p=<0.01). An educational intervention delivered by community health workers significantly improved colorectal cancer genetic knowledge compared to standard materials (2.7 more correct answers; p<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: