Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Electrochemical reduction of CO2 shows varied selectivity in product formation, indicating control mechanisms in catalysis.
Reduction of CO₂ by ne⁻ and nH⁺ (n = 2, 4, 6, 8) leads to different products like CO, HCOOH, HCHO, CH₃OH, and CH₄. Selective reduction of CO₂ to one of these products is a major challenge. Electrochemical reduction of CO₂ by iron porphyrin complexes with a pendant pyridine in its second sphere is investigated using a series of proton sources with varying pKa in CH₃CN. Acidic proton sources like phenols yield >80% H₂ even in CO₂-saturated CH₃CN solutions. This selectivity is switched to >95% CO when weaker proton sources like H₂O or sterically hindered phenols are used. Competitive H₂ generation is suppressed at low PhOH concentrations and CO initially produced gets further reduced to produce C₂H₆ resulting in an overall 14e⁻/14H⁺ reduction of CO₂ with >80% selectivity. The C-C bond formation at a monometallic site is aided by PhOH (also RSH) insertion into an iron porphyrin carbene produced during CO₂ reduction at the iron site generating a PhOCH₃ species, which reacts with a Fe-CH₃ species produced by the reduction of a second molecule of CO₂ at the same iron center to release C₂H₆. The same catalyst with pyridine in the second sphere, immobilized on a graphite electrode for fast electron transfer, reduces CO₂ in an aqueous medium to CH₄ with more than 90% selectivity and <5% CO is produced. Hence, the selectivity of CO₂ reduction, using the same catalyst, changes from 2e⁻/2H⁺ reduction to CO to 8H⁺/8e⁻ reduction to CH₄ and 14e⁻/14H⁺ reduction to C₂H₆ by altering proton and electron delivery to the catalyst.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patra et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: