This research examines hybrid governance dynamics in crisis decision-making within the EU, revealing key insights.
Purpose Amidst the backdrop of a poly-crisis and increasing turbulence, this research addresses the pressing need to understand the dynamics of crisis decision making within the European Union. The COVID-19 pandemic's transboundary nature revealed unprecedented adaptability within EU member states and institutions. Design/methodology/approach Using the lens of hybrid governance, the study examines decision-making in three key policy areas affected by the pandemic: restrictions on travel, vaccine procurement and the Recovery and Resilience Facility. By adopting a process tracing approach based on desk research and semi-structured interviews with senior EU officials, the article investigates the patterns and dynamics of hybrid governance observed during the crisis. Findings The findings reveal how mixes of governance ideal-types evolved to address varying levels of crisis complexity and urgency, leading to a common pattern of hybrid compositions across cases. Originality/value The research provides new insights into how the hybrid governance occurs in EU crisis decision-making, shedding light on the dynamic tensions and synergies between different governance mechanisms in times of unprecedented uncertainty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peeters et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: