PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2026BMJ Open Respiratory Research0 citationsOpen Access

Mortality and diagnostic practice variation in interstitial lung disease admissions: insights from a multicentre UK cohort study

View Full Paper
LWLaura Jane WhiteUniversity Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation TrustJSJonathon ShawStockport NHS Foundation TrustBPBethan PowellBlackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Key Points

  • Evaluate mortality outcomes and risk factors in interstitial lung disease-related admissions, focusing on acute exacerbations.
  • Conducted a retrospective cohort study across 11 NHS hospitals in the North West of England.
  • Analyzed ILD-related admissions coded by the International Classification of Diseases Version 10 from January 2017 to December 2019.
  • Classified acute exacerbations using established clinical criteria and confirmed some with CT scans.
  • Used Kaplan-Meier and multivariate proportional hazards modelling for statistical analyses.
  • 54.5% of ILD-related admissions met criteria for acute exacerbation of ILD.
  • Cumulative 90-day all-cause mortality was 40.2%, and 47.6% for the AEILD cohort.
  • Median survival was 107 days for AEILD, significantly lower than 241 days for other ILD-related admissions (p<0.0001).
  • 34% of AEILD cases had CT confirmation, with median survival differences based on CT results (p=0.027).
  • Preadmission oxygen levels, age, and neutrophilia were linked to mortality across both models.

Abstract

Background Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are a heterogeneous group of often progressive, unpredictable diseases. They frequently result in hospitalisations secondary to respiratory decompensation, termed ILD-related admissions. A proportion are due to an acute exacerbation of ILD (AEILD). All are associated with high mortality but are poorly characterised in real-world populations. Aim To evaluate mortality outcomes and associated risk factors following ILD-related hospital admissions, including AEILD. Methods We conducted a multicentre retrospective cohort study of primary International Classification of Diseases Version 10 coded admissions for ILD between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2019 across 11 NHS hospitals in the North West of England. AEILD events were classified using clinical criteria: <30-day respiratory deterioration not secondary to cardiac failure, pulmonary embolism or pneumothorax. The AEILD subgroup was divided into those with CT confirmation (definite AEILD) and without CT confirmation (suspected AEILD). Primary outcome was time from admission to death. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier and multivariate proportional hazards modelling. Results Of 938 ILD-related admissions, 54.5% met study AEILD criteria. Overall, cumulative all-cause mortality to 90-days post-discharge was 40.2%. For the AEILD cohort, cumulative all-cause mortality to 90-days post-discharge was 47.6%. Median survival of the AEILD cohort was 107 days (95% CI 87.0 to 141.0 days) and the other ILD-related admission cohort 241.0 days (95% CI 208.0 to 308.0 days), with a statistically significant difference in survival (p<0.0001). 37.6% (192/511) of AEILD events had CT confirmation. Within the AEILD subgroup, median survival was higher in the CT group (144 days vs 100 days, p=0.027). AEILD was independently associated with mortality in a multivariate model. Preadmission oxygen, age and neutrophilia were associated with mortality in both ILD-admission and AEILD 90-day all-cause mortality models. 13.9% of admissions had documented palliative care input. Conclusions Mortality associated with ILD-related admissions is high, with AEILD events independently associated with mortality. Findings highlight the need for improved education, access to palliative care and targeted AEILD research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

White et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fe07a79560c99a0a4773https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2025-004017
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper