This article explores legal challenges and privacy concerns in India’s evolving AI landscape, indicating a need for coherent regulation.
Artificial intelligence is no longer peripheral to India’s digital ecosystem; it is embedded within its administrative, financial, and social infrastructures. This shift has sharpened long-standing concerns around privacy, surveillance, and legal accountability. While the recognition of privacy as a fundamental right in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v Union of India (2017) and the enactment of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 signal meaningful progress, the regulatory response remains uneven. This article argues that India’s current framework, though increasingly rights-oriented, remains insufficiently attentive to the distinct risks posed by AI systems—particularly opacity, automated decision-making, and diffuse liability. Drawing on doctrinal analysis and comparative developments, it suggests that India’s legal architecture is evolving, but not yet coherently aligned with the realities of algorithmic governance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
PANIA et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: