This article explores how engaging with non-human entities enhances ethnography, indicating innovative approaches.
More-than-human beings consistently challenge ethnographic practices. However, ethnographic training has not consistently adopted such actors as irrefutable subjects of field research. In this article, I describe how the relationship between a parrot, a Kayapó shaman, and myself as a researcher impacted my ethnographic practice and research data. I aim to establish a framework to make more-than-humans' accountability evident in ethnography. I argue for creative ways of engaging with more-than-humans, suggesting "parrolitics" as a specific kind of cosmopolitics done with and by parrots. I demonstrate how being available and empathetic to more-than-humans was crucial to developing attentive patience as a skill, allowing me to engage with a parrot interlocutor, directly influencing my relationship with the animal’s companion, a human shaman. Combining multispecies ethnography and autoethnography, I contribute to both theories by using embodied affection to establish a solid connection between them. Finally, this study demonstrates that moving beyond established approaches that reduce animals to symbolic resources can offer new and refreshing perspectives for ethnographic work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taynã Tagliati (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: