Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrating improved image quality using deep learning in dentomaxillofacial imaging, suggesting significant benefits.
Abstract Background Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is widely used in dentomaxillofacial imaging and radiotherapy but is limited by noise and low contrast resolution. Deep learning (DL) has emerged as a promising tool for CBCT enhancement, improving image quality and diagnostic accuracy. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated DL-based techniques for dentomaxillofacial CBCT enhancement and their impact on objective image quality metrics. Methods A systematic search across six databases identified studies applying DL for CBCT enhancement. Performance metrics included mean absolute error (MAE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), and root mean squared error (RMSE). Risk of bias was assessed using the modified QUADAS-2 tool. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models, with effect sizes expressed as standardized mean differences (SMD) for MAE and RMSE and mean differences (MD) for PSNR and SSIM. Heterogeneity was evaluated using Cochran's Q and I² statistics. Results Thirty-seven studies met inclusion criteria, covering CBCT-to-CT synthesis (27), metal artifact reduction (4), noise reduction (3), motion artifact reduction (1), and super-resolution (2). DL significantly reduced MAE (SMD: −4.24, 95% CI: −5.68 to −2.80, p < 0.0001) and RMSE (SMD: −1.21, 95% CI: −1.55 to −0.88, p < 0.0001), while improving PSNR (MD: 3.60, 95% CI: 3.00 to 4.20, p < 0.0001) and SSIM (MD: 0.072, 95% CI: 0.055 to 0.089, p < 0.0001). High heterogeneity (I² > 99%) limits direct comparisons. Conclusion DL improves CBCT image quality, but methodological variability and limited clinical validation necessitate further research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sadr et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: