This research demonstrates energy savings in multi-stage MVR distillation through liquid injection and pre-compressor splitting, enhancing efficiency.
• Liquid injection is proposed as an intensified strategy for multi-stage MVR distillation. • Four steady-state multi-stage MVR configurations are developed and compared. • Exchanger-based intercooling with heat recovery reduces compression work by reintegrating sensible heat. • Liquid injection eliminates an intercooler heat exchanger but can increase second-stage compression load. • Pre-compressor splitting offsets injection-induced penalties and enables competitive or improved energy performance. Multi-stage mechanical vapor recompression (MVR) is a promising route to electrify and intensify distillation for wide-boiling separations, yet its deployment is often constrained by the need for effective inter-stage cooling and meaningful utilization of the associated sensible heat. This work proposes and evaluates liquid injection as a compact intensification alternative to conventional exchanger-based intercooling in a two-stage MVR system. Unlike prior work on discretely heat integrated distillation column (D-HIDiC), this study introduces liquid injection directly in MVR systems, eliminating intercooler hardware while maintaining energy performance. Four processes are examined: a two-stage MVR without intercooling ( MVR #1 ), an intercooled MVR with internal heat recovery to an additional bottom reboiler ( MVR #2 ), a liquid injection MVR without an intercooler ( MVR #3 ), and a liquid injection MVR combined with pre-compressor splitting ( MVR #4 ) to mitigate the increased second-stage load caused by injection. Compared with conventional distillation (CDiC, 10,073 kW reboiler duty), all MVR cases reduce the final energy input to 1,759–1,850 kW (81.6–82.5% savings) with COP values of 5.445–5.727; MVR #4 achieves the lowest compressor power (1,759 kW) and the highest COP (5.727). On a primary-energy basis (36.6% electricity conversion efficiency), the MVR schemes deliver 49.8–52.3% savings versus CDiC. Overall, liquid injection enables equipment simplification with competitive efficiency, while pre-compressor splitting provides a practical tuning degree of freedom to recover or improve performance without sacrificing compactness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cui et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: