PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 6, 2026npj Breast Cancer0 citationsOpen Access

Investigating the contribution of rare non-coding variants in BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2 to hereditary breast cancer

QZQihong ZhaoNLNa LiEMEvanny R. Marinović

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore the role of rare non-coding variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 in the context of hereditary breast cancer.
  • Analyzed intronic and upstream non-coding variants of BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2
  • Utilized full-gene sequencing of over 11,000 participants from the BEACCON case–control study
  • Conducted CRISPR/Cas9 knock-in assays in MCF10A cells to assess functional impacts.
  • 46.3% of breast cancer cases carried at least one rare non-coding variant
  • These variants were associated with a modest increase in breast cancer risk (OR = 1.2, p < 0.0001)
  • Stronger association found in triple-negative disease, especially for BRCA1 (OR = 1.5, p = 0.0001)
  • Identified 11 out of 42 variants with wild-type allele loss and high homologous recombination deficiency
  • Disrupted splicing was confirmed in two deep intronic variants affecting transcript expression.

Abstract

Abstract Pathogenic coding variants in BRCA1 , BRCA2 and PALB2 confer hereditary breast/ovarian cancer risk, yet these regions comprise less than 10% of the genomic footprint of these genes, leaving most sequence unexplored. We investigated the contribution of non-coding variation to hereditary breast cancer by analyzing intronic variants and 5′ upstream regions of BRCA1 , BRCA2 and PALB2 in the BEACCON case–control study of over 11,000 participants. Full-gene sequencing showed that 46.3% of cases carried at least one rare non-coding variant. This was associated with a modest increase in breast cancer risk (OR = 1.2, p < 0.0001), most likely reflecting the presence of a small proportion of pathogenic variants within a larger background of predominantly neutral variation. Stronger enrichment was observed for triple-negative disease, particularly for BRCA1 (OR = 1.5, p = 0.0001). Tumor sequencing of 42 high-priority variants identified 11 (26.2%) with wild-type allele loss and high homologous recombination deficiency. Functional CRISPR/Cas9 knock-in assays in MCF10A cells confirmed that two deep intronic variants created aberrant splice sites, disrupted splicing and impacted transcript expression.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d34dd49c07852e0af976fdhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-026-00942-z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Genetics of breast cancer: a topic in evolution2015 · 533 citations
  2. 2Hereditary Breast Cancer: The Era of New Susceptibility Genes2013 · 353 citations
  3. 3Ploidy and Large-Scale Genomic Instability Consistently Identify Basal-like Breast Carcinomas with BRCA1/2 Inactivation2012 · 691 citations
  4. 4Screening of BRCA1/2 deep intronic regions by targeted gene sequencing identifies the first germline BRCA1 variant causing pseudoexon activation in a patient with breast/ovarian cancer2018 · 43 citations
  5. 5Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome: Moving Beyond BRCA1 and BRCA22017 · 38 citations